Opinion: That Checking Account Will Cost You

arkadi_mortbanker-06-closeup

Post by Arkadi Kuhlmann, CEO of Savings

Imagine having a checking account that only shrinks when you spend money. Unfortunately for most banking customers, that’s becoming a pipe dream. Today, too many “free” checking accounts come with maintenance fees, monthly fees, overdraft fees and other unusual fees that steadily eat into account balances—even if the account holder doesn’t spend a dime.

And more fees are on the way. In fact, don’t be surprised if the term “free” soon becomes synonymous with “hidden fees” when it comes to banking.

That might sound strange coming from a banker and given that the federal government just issued new regulations to clamp down on exploitive overdraft charges. But some banks are already devising new and creative ways to make up that lost revenue. And their first target will be your checking account.

Starting in July, banks will no longer be allowed to automatically enroll customers in overdraft “protection” programs—and thus slap them with hidden fees when they overdraw their accounts. Instead, banks will be forced to obtain customers’ permission (opt-in) before allowing them to overcharge their debit card.

This is a big win for consumers. Last year, banks throughout America collected over $105 million in fees everyday because customers overdrew their checking accounts.

Here’s how overdraft fees currently work: Imagine that you pay all your monthly bills online on Monday. Three days later, the cable, phone, and electric companies all withdraw the money from your account—but your twice-monthly paycheck hasn’t posted yet. So when you pay for a $7 lunch with a debit card, you accidentally overdraw your account.

Most banks levy a hefty fee for covering this sort of mistake. For a typical customer, that $7 lunch would wind up costing $37 ($30 fee + $7 lunch). That’s not very convenient—or very fair.

Some banks are aware of the consumer backlash they may face because of their overdraft policies. One recently announced that it will pay heed to the new rules before the July deadline by scrapping overdraft penalties and replacing them with an opt-in “overdraft protection” program. Customers will have the option of linking their checking account to another account to transfer money in the event of an overdraft. Unsurprisingly, this service still comes with a fee.

Other banks offer an overdraft line of credit instead of a hefty fee. Customers who go into the red are charged a competitive interest rate on the amount they overdraw. At my bank’s current rate, for example, an overdraft line of credit of $100 would only cost a customer two cents a day. With the overdraft line of credit, an account holder has a low-cost way to learn to spend responsibly, and can still access funds in an emergency. And, yes, we’ve always required customers to opt-in to overdraft.

Of course, overdraft lines of credit aren’t as profitable as the old flat fees. So other banks are already looking for new ways to replace their fee income.

Expect monthly maintenance fees, minimum account requirements, and higher ATM fees. And expect banks to get creative with how they charge fees. For instance, checking account loans—in the form of payday loans—that advance customers money at an extremely high interest rate will become the latest gimmick to nickel and dime customers.

Don’t expect banks to tell you about any of these charges in their marketing campaigns. Here are three rules of thumb to keep in mind when deciding to keep or switch your checking account during this new checking fee frenzy:

1. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Ever notice that hard sells usually make up for inferior products? High interest rates with lots of “free” offerings probably mean you’re going to get dinged somewhere else. Where and how much are the questions to ask. Look out for the term “fee” more than “free” when reviewing the terms of checking accounts.

2. Stay clear if you can’t get a straight answer. You shouldn’t need an attorney to open a checking account. If the new terms and conditions of your checking account have lots of legal language and jargon, account holders beware. If these terms and conditions are typed on their own separate page or worse, booklet, be even more aware. All those words are probably packing hidden fees. Call your bank and ask for the facts on fees. If you get the run around, it may be time to shop for another bank.

3. If you get a notice that sounds scary, look for ulterior motives. Recently, some banks have been using scare tactics to get customers to opt into services that may cost more than what they’re worth. You might see a lower fee for overdrafting but higher fees at the ATM or elsewhere in your checking account. Decide on what services you need the most and what you’re willing to pay to use them.

In fact, a big bank recently announced that it will levy a $7.50 monthly maintenance fee on many checking accounts unless a customer maintains a minimum account balance of $1,500. Previously, this bank waived the fee if a customer had direct deposit or made at least two automatic bill payments a month.

Among banks that already charge their customers for just having a checking account, the average fee is $6.63 a month. That’s up 15 percent since 2008. While $6.63 per month might not sound like much, that adds up to about $80 over the course of a year. For an account with an average balance of $500, that’s equivalent to a 16 percent annual service charge.

Banks seem to think they can increase checking fees without losing customers. In a sense, they are gambling on customers believing that changing banks is too complicated and time consuming. But that confidence may be misplaced. Americans today have more choices than ever before and it’s now incredibly easy to switch bank accounts.

By putting in just a few minutes to move over to a low-cost bank, customers can save hundreds of dollars a year in fees. And, after all, shouldn’t banking be about making it easier to save money, not spend it?

Arkadi Kuhlmann is president and CEO of ING Direct USA. A version of this op-ed first appeared on AolNews.com on May 13, 2010.

Share Print
  • John

    Kuhlmann says, “when you pay for a $7 lunch with a debit card, you accidentally overdraw your account. Most banks levy a hefty fee for covering this sort of mistake. For a typical customer, that $7 lunch would wind up costing $37 ($30 fee + $7 lunch). That’s not very convenient—or very fair.”

    I completely disagree with Kuhlmann’s last sentence here. It’s much more convenient to have the bank provide overdraft protection than for the restaurant to return to your table and tell you that your card has been turned down. And it’s completely fair for the bank to charge you for essentially bouncing a check. Just keep track of how much money you have in your account and this won’t ever happen to you. You’ll never be charged that $30 if you keep track of your finances.

    On the other hand, I really like ING Direct. They’re much better than any of the brick and mortar options where I live.

  • Kevin

    Like John said, I disagree with the “…For a typical customer, that $7 lunch would wind up costing $37 ($30 fee + $7 lunch). That’s not very convenient—or very fair.” . While I may agree with Arkadi, that a $30 fee may be a bit high, I believe that we as consumers have a responsibility to ensure we have funds to cover are expenses. In my opinion, if you don’t already know if your paycheck has cleared, then don’t buy things until it has. I balance my checkbook to the penny. And I keep tabs on it through on-line banking.

    BTW, as I type this, I’m eating my brown-bag lunch which probably cost me $2.00…..

  • http://wwW.BEBEROCKSEMAIL@YAHOO.COM BEBE ROCKS

    We want to use ING coffe place within our OCEANS III locations for ART CULTURE & RECYCLING 20-40 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP IN COM MMUNITTEES RETREIVABLE THROUGH A NEW DOUBLE CODED CARD FROM ING ATM MACHINES AS CASH AND RECEIPT FOR HELPING MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE ENVIRONMENT>>>YOU ALSO CAN CHOOSE TO DONATE THE MONEY BACK TO CHARITY OR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES>>CONFERENCING.

    OCEANSIII: WE PLAN ON MAKING A DIFFERENCE EACH & EVERY DAY: http://www.oceansIII@AOL.COM

  • OPT-IN CONSUMER

    I disagree with Kevin and John. Unless they work for the big banks, I can’t understand why paying $37 for $7 lunch is “convenient”???? for the consumer.

    Alot of these banks make it confusing for you to know what your balance is even when you check online. One unnamed bank (hint crosslinks) uses software to strategically post the debit card transactions exactly when your balance would be ripe to trigger an overdraft (of course they will authorize the transaction at first but they wait until the right moment to post them to your account…Furthermore they sometimes don’t even reduce your available balance when they allow authorization and when you check online the balance doesn’t change until SURPRISE it posts 3-4 days later when your balance was low).

    In addition they post the transactions in a way that maximizes the overdraft fees….. I think the Federal govt got it right….if you are Kevin and John and want the pleasure to pay $37 for your $7 lunch then they can happily opt-in. Other consumers and I can opt-out, if I don’t have the money then I will use cash or just use a credit card….with or without embarrassment, the point is the merchant gets paid!!!

  • skrpune

    Sorry, opt-in…I’d have to agree with Kevin & John. If you can’t keep track of your finances, there’s no one else to blame. It’s certainly not the bank’s fault that you’re overdrawn. The fees themselves are indeed high, and banks automatically enrolling customers into overdraft programs definitely stinks, but we have to be smart consumers. It’s up to us to manage our finances and our accounts, and we can’t blame others for the consequences of a lack of funds to cover purchases and bank’s exercising their contractual rights.

    My advice to folks would be to educate themselves about the terms of their accounts. Talk to a banker, ask questions. And for goodness sake, don’t spend money you don’t have & keep track of your balance regularly. Online transaction histories can only be so accurate and the only way to truly be sure you don’t go into the negative is to balance your checkbook and/or use money management software. There are so many tools available to folks (both free & paid services/programs) to help with tracking money that there really is no good reason for folks to be going into the red.

  • smarternotharder

    I completely agree with the post, and find it pretty refreshing for a bank to finally admit that things have gotten off track. It would appear that ING is going to be smart, and start to appeal to a very large demographic of financial consumer that is growing increasingly more educated and increasingly more tired of these shenanigans. A banking institution that clearly wants to uphold an honest “spirit of service” in meeting their obligations to their client would of course look to align intuitively with what human nature often presents in regards to spending habits. Instead, many of the typical checking account offerings from these institutions are making a grave error in assuming that the general population is unable to think for themselves. The practices and fees regarding overdrafts have become so counterintuitive and convoluted in the context of the internet age that it is nearly impossible to manage the process efficiently if you are a typical paycheck-to-paycheck type of individual. Regardless of the “letter of the agreement” the bigger question must be posed- exactly what value am I receiving from a financial service that charges $37 for a cup of coffee?

    Here’s the thing- unlike $2 lunch guy, I’ve got other things to do than worry about my checking account all day long. I’m actually envious of those of you who can really focus that much energy and remain accountable to every cent of your cashflow- I don’t want to offend- I’m just saying that I am not cut of that cloth- I tend to want to get delivery on promised value, and that’s the point. There is more to the human experience than black and white regulations, and situations arise constantly that would put a paycheck-to-paycheck individual at risk of being taken to the cleaners with overdraft fees. Perhaps a job loss and burning through the savings would put you into a position of having a lot of existing monthly bills and each penny counting. The way most banks have overdraft fees set up is even far worse than was described in the lunch example -the actual reality of that example is more like this- if that paycheck doesn’t post on time, its not just the $7 lunch costing $37 that we have to contend with, It’s every other transaction that posts two hours too soon also- most of those “bills” are automated check drafts these days (which of course, fyi, are still fair game for the loan shark/legbreaker overdraft fees, even after the feds put a stop to the rest).

    My old bank was one of the largest in the country (has a horse and wagon for a logo, you get the idea) charges not $30, but $35 for each and every transaction that is overdrawn. On typical month end, this means that EVERY transaction that passes through before 3 PM (while my online transfers don’t post until after 3 PM, or my paycheck takes an extra 3 days to clear for some reason) all end up costing me $35 fees. Each and every one. And for those of you who are saying that I should wait until the check is cleared before paying the bills, riddle me this- my paycheck is ISSUED BY THE SAME BANK. It’s crazy to call that “service”. What convenience or value, or spirit of partnership and support am I receiving exactly? What exactly does my checking account get me these days?

    These banks are in for a rude awakening. And smart companies like ING are getting it. The general public is growing more educated – they are starting to realize that this is classic bait and switch, of the service-oriented variety- “convenience” is trumpeted as the value of a “free” checking account, and managing money online is encouraged through free cards, online account access, 24 hour phone support, etc. but as I believe someone else on this thread mentioned, the online management and account reporting often isn’t in real time, and is therefore reporting inaccurately. The banks know this- and if we go back to “paying for services rendered”, then we need to look at engaging in practices that support this dynamic, of which these are not! These institutions know that they have complete and subjective control of determining when to allow deposits to post, and they know most of us don’t carry around calculators, legal volumes, and magnifying glasses when it comes to looking for a supposedly SUPPORTIVE service that is supposed to be HELPING us.

    We’re human beings, not human calculators. And for those of us that pride ourselves on the ability to manage our checking accounts down to the penny while having a $2 lunch out of a bag, great- there are others of us that are high earners but may not have the time or the inclination to watch every petty transaction that a debit card is used for, or each automated draft that is so easy to set up these days. It isn’t about the loss of the cash- its the principle of the matter. We are being taken advantage of by the very folks who are trying to act as though they actually care about our welfare and financial success. It really is a complete misrepresentation. The ING website has a CALCULATOR right on the front page of their site that shows what they’ll charge you for overdraft fees vs. the rest. How great is that? And sure, I imagine they have some fine print too, but most of us that deserve to be treated fairly and aren’t the enemy of profits for the bank are able to cover our overdrawn fees within days or weeks. ING makes a few interest points for that convenience, and the world goes round- this is as it should be.
    I encourage all individual consumers (even those that pride themselves on balancing every penny they have every day and eating $2 lunches) to think of the big picture. Life should be enjoyed, after all, right? These banks may be “following the rules”, but so does your typical carnival game. Doesn’t make it right or honest. I applaud ING for making a fair profit on overdraft fees- one that is generally in line with a typical consumer credit line percentage and only extends over that period of time the account is overdrawn. After all, the bank is covering the debt- they should profit. But a hidden smack in the mouth for a $37 cup of coffee tied to some puppet strings called “online convenience” is unethical.

    Good for ING in their approach, I say. It will endear more intelligent consumers to them. For those of us intelligent enough to look for alternatives when we see shady business practices right in front of us, the bottom line is pretty simple- show us where more value can be had by keeping a normal checking account service employed vs. keeping our money in a bag under a mattress, and the folks that want to stand by the “letter of the law” argument for these corporate ripoff artists might have the beginnings of an argument. Until then, thanks to ING I have solved the problem with not a million calculations and daily spreadsheet balancing, but instead through a much simpler method. I moved my business to an institution that offers me a real and fair value for the profit they deserve. Which means I can afford to have a nice steak for lunch.

  • Rosemary

    I am a loyal ING customer and have been so for many years. I am also a licensed business banker at one of the banks you now seem very keen on bashing.
    While I admire the service you provide and the higher interest rates you pay, I do not appreciate the continual reference to the big banks being far inferior to you in fees and interest. We never speak ill of ING or any competitor to our customers, as such behavior is unprofessional. You should well know that our banks are different and provide different needs.
    You are unable to notarize documents for customers, provide signature guarantees, be a face a customer talks to when they have problems with debt, help them set up a business, be a presence that can clear a check for a customer who has a need for immediate finance, provide a free safe deposit box, and I could go on.
    And there is also the 2 to 4 day delay to get funds back into an account from ING if money is needed in a hurry. We often find an ING customer who has had a returned check because funds did not show up in a timely manner and return the fee for them even though it was not a bank error. Any customer using ING can rarely operate without a second bank.
    I further wish to advise you that 5 of those fees you mentioned on your “real fees” list are not applicable to most of the big banks.
    So kindly do your organization a service and stop your unprofessional behavior in bashing the competition and sell your services based on their merits. Remember also you are not under the same rules as the bricks and mortar banks and nor do you have highly trained professionals sitting in front of your customers so there is no comparison to be made.